Bobby V Ashdown House School

Case Summary: Bobby v Ashdown House School

Background: Bobby, a 10-year-old pupil with ADHD and sensory processing difficulties, was permanently excluded from Ashdown House, an independent prep school. His parents challenged the exclusion, arguing it was discriminatory under the Equality Act 2010, specifically:

  • Section 15: Discrimination arising from disability
  • Section 85: Provisions relating to schools

First Tier Tribunal (FTT): The tribunal found the exclusion was unlawful and discriminatory. It ordered the school to:

  • Reinstate Bobby
  • Provide extra tuition for lost learning
  • Issue a formal apology

Appeal to Upper Tribunal: The school appealed, claiming FTT orders werenโ€™t enforceable against independent schools. The Upper Tribunal rejected this, affirming that:

  • Independent schools are bound by the Equality Act
  • FTT has wide powers to enforce remedies, including reinstatement and support

Legal Significance

  • Precedent-setting: As an Upper Tribunal decision, it clarified that disabled pupils in independent schools are protected under the Equality Act.
  • Tribunal authority: It confirmed that tribunals can compel schools to take corrective action, even in the independent sector.
  • Equality enforcement: Reinforced the principle that equality is a legal obligation, not a discretionary policy.

Official Legal Reference

You can read the full judgment and legal details in the official government publication: ๐Ÿ‘‰ https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/5d70d6cce5274a097d6dd91a/HS_1322_2019-00.pdf

And for a broader legal context, the Equality and Human Rights Commission provides a summary of the case and its implications: ๐Ÿ‘‰ https://www.equalityhumanrights.com/our-work/legal-action-search/protecting-right-education-children-independent-schools

Did this answer your question? Thanks for the feedback There was a problem submitting your feedback. Please try again later.